Writing 02

What is your overall impression of the hiring process in your chosen industry? Is it efficient? Is it effective? Is it ethical?

I’ve had a somewhat limited experience with the general hiring process in the tech industry. My first (and so far only) real experience really going through it all was at the beginning of my sophomore year. I applied to Google’s Engineering Practicum program, designed specifically for freshmen and sophomores. The hiring committee was made aware of my current course work (at that point it was basically a month and a half of FundComp) and tailored my two technical interviews accordingly. I was asked pretty basic questions, all of which I was able to answer fairly well. I ended up getting an offer and interned at Google in New York that following summer. After that internship ended, I was given a return offer without having to interview again, and accepted without hesitation.

After another summer at Google as a full SWE intern, I was able to bypass interviews for full time conversion. Google is notoriously slow with their full time conversion offers, so I am still waiting to hear back. Hopefully I will receive news in the next week. I am expecting it to be good, but in case that isn’t what happens (and even if it does) I have been seeking out other opportunities.

I have an interview on campus with Microsoft next week that I am eagerly and slightly anxiously anticipating. It will be my first real interview since that first round at the start of my sophomore year. I’ve learned so much since then, and expect it to be a lot more challenging.

While at Google last summer, I took advantage of the generosity of several full time employees and did some mock interviews to prepare. I was terribly rusty, but it was great practice.

Not having gone through the whole ringer of hiring multiple times, I can’t speak very deeply about how I feel about the general hiring process, but I do have a few thoughts.

I feel incredibly lucky to have been able to showcase my skills and work in a real office setting, allowing those in charge of making decisions to see what I’m really capable of. I simply do not see how a 45 minute whiteboard coding interview is enough to decide whether or not a candidate is right for the job.

That being said, I don’t have a suggestion for a great alternative. The best way to evaluate a candidate is to see them working in a real setting, but that obviously isn’t feasible for most scenarios.

If I hadn’t had such fortunate circumstances, I’m sure I would have used Notre Dame resources much more heavily. With everything that’s happened with Google, though, I haven’t done much. Never been to the Career Fair or Career Center, but I do know that many find these resources extremely valuable.

Everything has worked out pretty well for me and I don’t think I’d change anything if I had a chance to go back. That being said, I would probably encourage my past self to spend a little more time on side projects. Even though I didn’t necessarily need them to get where I am now, I feel like if I’d developed some specialized skills through extracurricular project work, it would have set me up very well for exploring other options.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Writing 07

What are the limits of  freedom of speech  on the Internet? Is  online censorship  a desirable good, a necessary evil, or a bad idea be avoided? I believe that freedom of speech is a core human right that should be protected at high cost. Being able to have meaningful discussions with people of differing opinions is important, and can lead to great progress in making our world safer, richer, and more inclusive. The internet provides a platform unlike any other for ideas to be shared and discussed, and I believe it should be used to do so. With that being said, though, I still believe companies have LIMITED a right and responsibility to how their product/platform is being used. As has been shown before, HATE speech is not protected as free speech in real life, and nor should it be online. Thoughtful, reasoned discussion should always be encouraged. Angry, senseless hatred, however, is different. I understand that this idea is very precarious, and deciding what does or does not qua
Read more

Writing 05

Where do you draw the line between  individual privacy  and  national security ? In a democracy, which one is paramount? In the past, I haven't given much thought to individual privacy if I am being totally honest. I've sort of had the mindset of "I have nothing to hide so why should I care?" I'm not involved in anything shady, and really believe that if literally my entire digital footprint was leaked to the world, the worst that would happen would me some mild embarrassment. After this week of discussion, though, my opinion has shifted rather drastically. Snowden's adage of "not caring about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like not caring about free speech because you have nothing to say" really stuck with me. What happens if the day comes where you DO have something to hide? By then, since you've been complacent in the privacy war thus far, it's too late. Even if that day never comes, I still see great value in internet p
Read more

Writing 04

According to  Roger Boisjoly , "[whistleblowing] destroyed [his] career, [his] life, everything else." What good, then, is  whistleblowing ? In today's ever growing world of technology where systems become more and more complicated and more integrated into our everyday lives, the room for error, disaster, and misuse of power grows too. Whether it is technical failure or unethical behavior, whistleblowers have played in integral part in alerting the public to the wrongdoings of engineers and the leadership bodies that govern them. I think the less ambiguous, more clear-cut "acceptable whistleblowing" is when it relates to "engineering disasters." If an organization cuts corners in ways that lead to some sort of serious malfunction resulting in significant damage, I believe those involved have a moral obligation to come forward with any knowledge they have. This is important for two reasons: to hold those responsible accountable and to best ensure a
Read more